Signal-to-noise ratio of Gaussian-state ghost imaging
Name
Erkmen-2009-Signal-to-noise rati.pdf
Size
324.56 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
35d49be53197aa50ab3fd92b06c8992e
Author(s) •
Erkmen, Baris I.
Shapiro, Jeffrey H.
Date Issued
February 2009
Journal
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society
Citation
Erkmen, Baris I., and Jeffrey H. Shapiro. “Signal-to-noise ratio of Gaussian-state ghost imaging.” Physical Review A 79.2 (2009): 023833. © 2009 The American Physical Society.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of three Gaussian-state ghost-imaging configurations—distinguished by the nature of their light sources—are derived. Two use classical-state light, specifically a joint signal-reference field state that has either the maximum phase-insensitive or the maximum phase-sensitive cross correlation consistent with having a proper P representation. The third uses nonclassical light, in particular an entangled signal-reference field state with the maximum phase-sensitive cross correlation permitted by quantum mechanics. Analytic SNR expressions are developed for the near-field and far-field regimes, within which simple asymptotic approximations are presented for low-brightness and high-brightness sources. A high-brightness thermal-state (classical phase-insensitive state) source will typically achieve a higher SNR than a biphoton-state (low-brightness, low-flux limit of the entangled-state) source, when all other system parameters are equal for the two systems. With high efficiency photon-number-resolving detectors, a low-brightness, high-flux entangled-state source may achieve a higher SNR than that obtained with a high-brightness thermal-state source.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.023833