Comparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics
Name
Magnetic Resonance in Med - 2023 - Kazemivalipour - Comparison of tight‐fitting 7T parallel‐transmit head array designs.pdf
Size
7.46 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e4a21545079864c124ea1cd22235bce2
Author(s)
Kazemivalipour, Ehsan
Wald, Lawrence L.
Guerin, Bastien
Date Issued
November 6, 2023
Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Citation
Kazemivalipour E, Wald LL, Guerin B. Comparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics. Magn Reson Med. 2024; 91: 1209-1224.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Purpose: We model the performance of parallel transmission (pTx) arrays with8, 16, 24, and 32 channels and varying loop sizes built on a close-fitting helmetfor brain imaging at 7 T and compare their local specific absorption rate (SAR)and flip-angle performances to that of birdcage coil (used as a baseline) andcylindrical 8-channel and 16-channel pTx coils (single-row and dual-row).
Methods: We use the co-simulation approach along with MATLAB scriptingfor batch-mode simulation of the coils. For each coil, we extracted B 1+ mapsand SAR matrices, which we compressed using the virtual observation pointsalgorithm, and designed slice-selective RF shimming pTx pulses with multiplelocal SAR and peak power constraints to generate L-curves in the transverse,coronal, and sagittal orientations.
Results: Helmet designs outperformed cylindrical pTx arrays at a constant num-ber of channels in the flip-angle uniformity at a constant local SAR metric: up to29% for 8-channel arrays, and up to 34% for 16-channel arrays, depending on theslice orientation. For all helmet arrays, increasing the loop diameter led to betterlocal SAR versus flip-angle uniformity tradeoffs, although this effect was morepronounced for the 8-channel and 16-channel systems than the 24-channel and32-channel systems, as the former have more limited degrees of freedom andtherefore benefit more from loop-size optimization.
Conclusion: Helmet pTx arrays significantly outperformed cylindrical arrayswith the same number of channels in local SAR and flip-angle uniformitymetrics. This improvement was especially pronounced for non-transverse sliceexcitations. Loop diameter optimization for helmets appears to favor large loops,compatible with nearest-neighbor decoupling by overlap.
MIT Department
Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29900
