Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. CSAIL Digital Archive
  4. CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  5. Asynchronous Failure Detectors

Asynchronous Failure Detectors

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

MIT-CSAIL-TR-2013-025.pdf

Size

545.7 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

6b653c262d9598d5997231260fcdc008

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
joanne@CSAIL.MIT.EDU-5256e2f6.29807.zip (483.83 KB)
Author(s)
Cornejo, Alejandro
•
Lynch, Nancy A.
•
Sastry, Srikanth
Advisor(s)
Nancy Lynch
Date Issued
October 10, 2013
Series/Report no.
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2013-025
Abstract
Failure detectors -- oracles that provide information about process crashes -- are an important abstraction for crash tolerance in distributed systems. The generality of failure-detector theory, while providing great expressiveness, poses significant challenges in developing a robust hierarchy of failure detectors. We address some of these challenges by proposing (1) a variant of failure detectors called asynchronous failure detectors and (2) an associated modeling framework. Unlike the traditional failure-detector framework, our framework eschews real-time completely. We show that asynchronous failure detectors are sufficiently expressive to include several popular failure detectors including, but not limited to, the canonical Chandra-Toueg failure detectors, Sigma and other quorum failure detectors, Omega, anti-Omega, Omega^k, and Psi_k. Additionally, asynchronous failure detectors satisfy many desirable properties: they are self-implementable, guarantee that stronger asynchronous failure-detectors solve harder problems, and ensure that their outputs encode no information other than the set of crashed processes. We introduce the notion of a failure detector being representative for a problem to capture the idea that some problems encode the same information about process crashes as their weakest failure detectors do. We show that a large class of problems, called bounded problems, do not have representative failure detectors. Finally, we use the asynchronous failure-detector framework to show how sufficiently strong AFDs circumvent the impossibility of consensus in asynchronous systems.
Description
This report supersedes MIT-CSAIL-TR-2013-002.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81371
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.