MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Why software firms build hardware, and what Microsoft is doing about it

Author(s)
Shaffer, Ryan M. (Ryan Matthew)
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (548.9Kb)
Other Contributors
System Design and Management Program.
Advisor
Michael Cusumano.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Many software companies build first-party hardware products due to the trend toward smaller, more highly-integrated devices, along with the fast pace of innovation in the technology industry. Building hardware products does not always lead to success and actually creates a financial risk for the company by significantly reducing profit margins as compared to the traditional profit margins to which large software companies are accustomed. Three specific strategies are observed which firms have used successfully in this area. First, the "Hardware First" strategy is described, wherein a company builds devices with the primary goal of selling those devices bundled with the company's software. Second, the "Proprietary Devices" strategy is presented, in which a company builds a device that is targeted at a particular market or function and locks in the customer to the firm's ecosystem. This strategy has been observed to succeed in markets where the technology is not yet mature, as well as in cases where the device has a particular purpose that cannot be achieved as effectively with a general-purpose device. Third, the "Service Funnels" strategy is considered, wherein a firm builds hardware devices whose primary intent is to drive usage and revenue of its core software and services products. Microsoft and its various hardware strategies over the years are especially considered, including products such as Xbox, Zune, Kin, and Surface, as well as its acquisition of Nokia's devices business. Each of the three observed strategies has been used by Microsoft at various times, and analysis of these strategies is used to help explain why some products have succeeded while others have failed dramatically in the marketplace. Microsoft's core capability is undoubtedly in software, and developing a mutually-beneficial relationship between its hardware and software products will be key to the long-term success of Microsoft in today's technology landscape.
Description
Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, System Design and Management Program, 2015.
 
This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
 
"February 2015." Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
 
Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-66).
 
Date issued
2015
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/100312
Department
System Design and Management Program.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Engineering Systems Division., System Design and Management Program.

Collections
  • Graduate Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.