Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonna H. Rhodes.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAng, Ying Hannen_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-16T16:34:43Z
dc.date.available2015-12-16T16:34:43Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/100368
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, System Design and Management Program, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 83-88).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is concerned with understanding the question on why, for several decades, engineers and project managers were experiencing similar frustrations when engineering and managing systems-of-systems despite various technological and organizational efforts. The first objective of this thesis is to identify the common frustrations in the area of System-of-Systems operations, management and system engineering. A second objective is to understand the systemic causes of these frustrations using different system engineering methods and tools. A series of interviews with mid-career experts from different disciplines were conducted in order to capture expert knowledge. Half of them were end-users from U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) while the other half represented the defense industry. A total of twelve common themes were observed: Technical Challenges: 1) Poor Requirements Engineering, 2) High Complexity and Magnitude of SoS, 3) Complex Stakeholder Management, 4) Evolving SoS Requirements. Management 'Pain Points': 5) Lack of Strong Leadership, 6) Misalignment between Industry & End-users, 7) Unstable Budget Environment, 8) Limited Information Available, 9) Information Compartmentalization. 10) High Turnover Rate Organizational Influences: 11) Excessive Bureaucracy, 12) Risk Avoidance Culture. By applying causal loop analysis and comparing the findings against current literature, a total of seven insights are identified: 1) Adopting Systems Thinking Perspective, 2) Understanding impact of Upstream Decisions, 3) Balancing Engineering and Politics, 4) Aligning Stakeholders, 5) Identifying gaps in Communication and Knowledge Management, 6) Understanding that workarounds may result in Technical Debt, 7) Understanding the Defense Culture, The thesis concludes with discussions on the seven insights as well as possible areas for future research. The author hopes that insights from this thesis will be used to develop guidance and advice for SoS engineering in future.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ying Hann Ang.en_US
dc.format.extent94 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleInvestigating the frustrations in managing and engineering defense system-of systemsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.identifier.oclc931582391en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record