Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEdward M. Greitzer and Alejandra Uranga.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCasses, Cécile J. (Cécile Jeanne Florence)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-03T21:04:43Z
dc.date.available2016-03-03T21:04:43Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/101494
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 133-135).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis describes experimental assessments of the aerodynamic boundary layer ingestion (BLI) benefit of the D8 advanced civil aircraft design. Two independent methods were applied for 1:11 scale (4.1 m wingspan) powered aircraft model experiments in the NASA Langley 14x22-foot Subsonic Wind Tunnel. The metric used as a surrogate for fuel consumption was the input mechanical flow power, and the benefit was quantified by back-to-back comparison of non-BLI (podded) and BLI (integrated) configurations. The first method (indirect) was the estimate of mechanical flow power based on the measured electrical power to the propulsors, plus supporting experiments to characterize the efficiencies of the fans and the electric motors that drive them, at the MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory. The second method (direct) was the direct integration of flowfield measurements, from five-hole probe surveys at the inlet and exit of the propulsors, which provided flow angles, velocity components, and pressure coefficients. Data were taken at different wind tunnel speeds, and conditions to determine overall performance dependence on non-dimensional power and angle of attack. At the simulated cruise point, the first method gave a measured aerodynamic BLI benefit of 7.9% +/- 1.5% at 70 mph tunnel velocity, and 8.5% +/- 1.5% at 84 mph, and the second method gave a measured benefit of 8.1% +/- 3.3% at 70 mph, and 12.2% +/- 3.4% at 84 mph. For the aircraft models examined, the aerodynamic benefit was found to come primarily from a decrease in the propulsor jet velocity (increase in propulsive efficiency) and thus a decreased jet dissipation, with the contribution from decreased wake and airframe dissipation being roughly an order of magnitude smaller.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Cécile J. Casses.en_US
dc.format.extent135 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleAerodynamic benefits of boundary layer ingestion for the D8 double-bubble aircraften_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc939657600en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record