Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Eric
dc.contributor.authorTenenbaum, Joshua B.
dc.contributor.authorDuvenaud, David
dc.contributor.authorSpeekenbrink, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorGershman, Samuel J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-27T19:26:00Z
dc.date.available2016-05-27T19:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102698
dc.description.abstractHow do people learn about complex functional structure? Taking inspiration from other areas of cognitive science, we propose that this is accomplished by harnessing compositionality: complex structure is decomposed into simpler building blocks. We formalize this idea within the framework of Bayesian regression using a grammar over Gaussian process kernels. We show that participants prefer compositional over non-compositional function extrapolations, that samples from the human prior over functions are best described by a compositional model, and that people perceive compositional functions as more predictable than their non-compositional but otherwise similar counterparts. We argue that the compositional nature of intuitive functions is consistent with broad principles of human cognition.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Center for Brains, Minds and Machines (CBMM), funded by NSF STC award CCF – 1231216.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Brains, Minds and Machines (CBMM)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCBMM Memo Series;048
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectcognitive scienceen_US
dc.subjectDevelopment of Intelligenceen_US
dc.subjecthuman cognitionen_US
dc.titleProbing the compositionality of intuitive functionsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record