Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeveson, Nancy G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-02T14:53:36Z
dc.date.available2016-06-02T14:53:36Z
dc.date.issued2011-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102833
dc.description.abstractCertification of safety-critical systems is usually based on evaluation of whether a system or product reduces risk of specific losses to an acceptable level. There are major differences, however, in how that decision is made and on what evidence is required. The term Safety Case has become popular recently as a solution to the problem of regulating safety-critical systems. The term arises from the HSE (Health and Safety Executive) in the U.K., but different definitions seem to be rife. To avoid confusion, this paper uses the term “assurance cases” for the general term and limits the use of the term “safety case” to a very specific definition as an argument for why the system is safe. This paper examines the use of safety cases and regulation in general. The first important distinction is between types of regulation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2011-13
dc.titleThe Use of Safety Cases in Certification and Regulationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record