Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Jeremiah
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Romain
dc.contributor.authorLindsey, Johnathan
dc.contributor.authorMaro, Judith
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Juan
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-02T23:56:34Z
dc.date.available2016-06-02T23:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2007-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102881
dc.description.abstractIn 2002, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) [1], largely in response to voting irregularities in the 2000 presidential election in Florida. Congress intended that HAVA resolve the lingering public confidence issues arising from inconsistent local election administration procedures, punch card voting machines, and voter registration. With HAVA, Congress authorized payments to the states to implement significant reforms of the voting system. However, the use of electronic voting machines to meet HAVA requirements threatens to damage public confidence in the voting system. Several reports have been published that note security flaws in voting systems in use all over the country [2]. California sued a manufacturer claiming that the company had misrepresented the security of its voting machines and falsified certification information [3]. In Ohio, a battleground state, recount irregularities also resulted in a lawsuit [4]. The public outcry and enormous media attention on these problems prompted Congress's Government Accountability Office (GAO) to launch an investigation [5].en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2007-04
dc.titlePathways to a Trusted Electronic Voting Systemen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record