Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Stan Neil
dc.contributor.authorLarson, Richard Charles
dc.contributor.authorNigmatulina, Karima
dc.contributor.authorTeytelman, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-06T20:04:58Z
dc.date.available2016-06-06T20:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102998
dc.description.abstractObjective. Allocation of vaccines and deployment of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are critical to controlling influenza. We examine how these policies can minimize the societal impact. Methods. An engineering systems framing and modeling approach incorporates theories and data on the spread of influenza. Models employed data from the CDC and state governments on cases and vaccine administered during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak, and published literature on how to reduce human-to-human contacts. Results. During the outbreak, barely half of all states received proportional allotments of vaccine in time to protect any citizens, while fewer sought vaccine after the peak. While individuals prone to contract and spread infection drive the progression, diligent hygiene practices and social distancing measures can drive down the number of cases. Conclusions. NPIs are highly effective in reducing the spread of influenza before, but also after vaccine is administered. Policies to allocate vaccine in direct proportion to population should be replaced and larger stocks sent to regions where greater numbers of persons stand to be protected.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2014-07
dc.titleEngineering Effective Response to Outbreaks of Influenzaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record