Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWanda J. Orlikowski.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKarunakaran, Arvinden_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-22T17:48:08Z
dc.date.available2016-06-22T17:48:08Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103215
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 32-34).en_US
dc.description.abstractPlatform services - services that are provided to organizations through online platforms - are increasingly being adopted and used within firms. The novelty of these services is generating uncertainties for both providers and customers. As these uncertainties and their consequences are not well understood in the existing literature, our research focused on articulating the nature of these uncertainties and explicating how they are being managed by providers of platform services. We conducted an 18-month field study of a platform service in the enterprise cloud computing industry, and found uncertainties associated with a number of concerns over the platform's privacy, security, flexibility, capacity, responsiveness, and innovativeness, and about the trustworthiness and credibility of the platform provider. We identified five mechanisms that the platform provider employs to manage these concerns - architecting boundaries, enforcing safeguards, segmenting customers, producing trust rhetoric, and articulating trust indicators. The first three mechanisms can be seen to constitute platform work - the work of designing, safeguarding, and keeping the system up and running so as to ensure the reliability of the platform, while the latter two mechanisms constitute trust work - the work of producing and disseminating a trust rhetoric so as to assure customers and prospects of the accountability of the platform provider. We found that both platform and trust work entail practices of materialization that normalize the uncertainties by downplaying certain concerns (privacy, capacity, responsiveness, credibility), while emphasizing others (security, flexibility, innovativeness, trustworthiness). Our findings highlight the enactment of uncertainty management, showing how reliability (of the platform) and accountability (of the platform provider) are performed in an ongoing manner, with important implications for the delivery of platform services to firms.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Arvind Karunakaran.en_US
dc.format.extent38, [2] pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleDealing with uncertainties in platform servicesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Management Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc951477755en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record