Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKerri Cahoy and Don Rosenfield.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGantner, Karl (Karl Andrew)en_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T19:13:38Z
dc.date.available2016-09-13T19:13:38Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104217
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2016. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 50-52).en_US
dc.description.abstractReducing cycle time for geostationary communication satellites represents a major competitive advantage for manufacturers. Reducing cycle time can be done through application of lean manufacturing techniques such as production leveling, or heijunka. However, research on applying lean manufacturing to the manufacture of satellites is not straightforward as payloads vary considerably. To show the effect of production leveling on satellite manufacturing, we analyze production data recorded over a 5-year time frame from a major satellite manufacturer to propose and simulate a method for leveling production. Statistical analysis of historical cycle times was performed to identify the critical path and bottleneck in the satellite development process. Production through the bottleneck was then leveled at the maximum consistent throughput. The effect of leveling was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation to predict the total cycle time and delivery date for each satellite. Analysis showed that the critical path ran through the development of the communications payload and the bottleneck was at the payload unit build process. The bottleneck was leveled to operate at a takt time of 2 months with 4 payloads in WIP at a time. Simulating a leveled bottleneck estimated that the total cycle time of each satellite, on average, would decrease by 1.9 months with a standard deviation of 14 days. Cycle time in the payload unit manufacturing process fell from 13 months to 8 months, with standard deviations 64 and 12 days, respectively. Over the 5-year period investigated, all satellites through the factory would have met their delivery dates while being produced to a 2 month takt. These results demonstrate that production leveling can be applied to the high-mix low volume manufacturing of geostationary communications satellites to increase efficiency and reduce cycle time. Leveling manufacturing should be a top priority for all satellite manufacturers looking to become more competitive.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Karl Gantner.en_US
dc.format.extent52 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Global Operations Program.en_US
dc.titleProduction leveling and cycle time reduction in satellite manufacturingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Global Operations Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc958140964en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record