Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWarren Seering, Dan Frey and Joel Harbour.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStepanchick, Justinen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T19:22:45Z
dc.date.available2016-09-13T19:22:45Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104297
dc.descriptionThesis: Nav. E., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 124-127).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Navy Acquisition force is faced with designing, procuring, and managing some of the most complex systems and technologies imagined. Balancing a shrinking and fickle budget environment with a program that has dynamic requirements and scheduling pressures only complicates this already difficult job. While developing these increasingly complex systems, major programs often face decisions without a sufficient analysis on a performance-versus-cost tradeoff. To surmount these challenges, the Navy must look at how industries excelled in similar environments. The concept of Model Based Engineering (MBE) is introduced as an approach that could move Navy Acquisition from document-centric to model-centric, enabling efficiency and confidence in design, as demonstrated by some industries. MBE is the practice of bridging models together from requirements to functions, for analysis, design, and verification of a system throughout the lifecycle. A tenet of MBE is model and design validation throughout development to ensure system requirements are met at delivery. Ultimately, the ability to understand and know the effects of changes in a subsystem on the overall performance can vastly improve a system's development. Through the practice of MBE, more confident design and acquisition decisions can be made earlier in the lifecycle. MBE involves pushing coordination and integration of subsystems as early in development as possible. Applying MBE is demanding but, done successfully brings major benefits, such as reducing expensive rework late in the lifecycle. Succinctly put, MBE enables: Objectively evaluating the design space, Choosing the right alternatives, and Building the system right the first time. Three components comprise the research presented in this thesis for operationalizing those MBE enablers for the DoD. The first component summarizes some of the MBE research to date. The second component provides an outline for establishing an MBE design and acquisition framework. Lastly, two MBE trade studies will demonstrate how a comprehensive evaluation of the trade space can lead to confident acquisition decisions.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Justin Stepanchick.en_US
dc.format.extent128 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleIntegrating Model Based Engineering and trade space exploration into naval acquisitionsen_US
dc.title.alternativeIntegrating MBE and trade space exploration into naval acquisitionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeNav. E.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc958163348en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record