Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeter P. Belobaba.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPetraru, Orenen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T19:25:42Z
dc.date.available2016-09-13T19:25:42Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104325
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Transportation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 123-125).en_US
dc.description.abstractPassenger demand forecasting, and subsequently passenger cancellation forecasting, are important components in any airline revenue management (RM) system. Passenger cancellations can potentially lead to flights leaving with empty seats and thus to loss of revenues. Airlines need accurate cancellation forecasting tools in order to properly compensate for cancellations, or in other words, overbook flights above their physical capacity. At the same time, airlines need to be cautious not to overbook too aggressively. If a flight is still overbooked at time of departure, not all passengers are able to board and those left behind need to be compensated and re-accommodated. This thesis focuses on modelling and forecasting passenger cancellations using the PODS booking simulation tool. Several methods for cancellation forecasting and overbooking are presented and their impacts are tested under different demand, competition and RM strategy settings. All methods are based on time series modeling of historical observations. However, the methods differ in terms of the data they use and the canceled bookings they compensate for. The potential contribution of Passenger Name Record data (PNR) to more accurate cancellation forecasting is discussed as well. Simulation results indicate that the ticket revenue gains due to cancellation forecasting and overbooking range between 1.15% and 4.16%, depending on the cancellation forecasting method used and the level of overbooking aggressiveness. However, aggressive overbooking increases the negative effect on revenues due to the costs associated with denied hoardings. Therefore, after taking into account these costs, the net revenue gains range between 0.06% and 2.79%. For airlines with high cancellation rates, the magnitude of the gains from cancellation forecasting and overbooking is even greater, reaching 3.59% in net revenue improvements.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Oren Petraru.en_US
dc.format.extent125 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAirline passenger cancellations : modeling, forecasting and impacts on revenue managementen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Transportationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc958279750en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record