Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSo, Kwan-Loken_US
dc.contributor.otherGeneral Electric Companyen_US
dc.contributor.otherGeneral Motors Corporation. Allison Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Gas Turbine Laboratoryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-06T21:21:54Z
dc.date.available2016-10-06T21:21:54Z
dc.date.issued1964en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104677
dc.descriptionSeptember 1964en_US
dc.descriptionErrata sheet inserteden_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.descriptionPreliminary reporten_US
dc.description.abstractThe behavior of vortex flow in a conical diffuser has been studied in this report. The flow considered here is a steady, incompressible, axially symmetric one. The present experimental investigation has resulted in the establishment of five flow regimes. These regimes represent three basic types of rotating flow and two transitional phenomena. In Regime 1 the flow is a laminar, one-celled vortex. In Regime 3 the flow is also a one-celled vortex, but turbulent, In Regime 5 the flow is a turbulent, two-celled vortex. Regime 2 represents the transition of a one-celled vortex flow from laminar to turbulent. This transition is characterized by the formation of a bubble along the axis. Regime 4 shows another transitional phenomenon. This transition is the breakdown of a two-celled vortex into a one-celled vortex, but the character of this breakdown is still not fully explored. These regimes can be considered as the steps that the flow in the diffuser must go through as the flow rate or swirl is increased. The number associated with these regimes indicates the order of change from one regime to another. In Regimes 1,3, and 5, similarity in the velocity profiles does exist, but not in Regimes 2 and 4. For simplicity Regime 3 was selected as the basis for a theoretical model. The initial requirement that the total head in the outer region of the flow be conserved proved unsuccessful. When this condition was dropped in favor of the moment of axial momentum, a theoretical development at least qualitatively in agreement with the observed vortex decay is achieved. It is felt that the neglect of turbulent shear stresses in the analysis is largely responsible for the discrepancy that exists between theory and experiment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnder the sponsorship of General Electric Company, Allison Division of General Motors Corporationen_US
dc.format.extent1 volume ([120] pages in various pagings)en_US
dc.publisherCambridge, Mass. : b Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, [1964]en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGTL report #75en_US
dc.subject.lccTJ267.A1 M37 no.75en_US
dc.subject.lccQA925 .S6 1964en_US
dc.subject.lcshVortex-motionen_US
dc.subject.lcshDiffusersen_US
dc.titleVortex decay in a conical diffuseren_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.identifier.oclc09162658en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record