Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFiona Murray.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRichert, Bailey E. (Bailey Elizabeth)en_US
dc.contributor.otherTechnology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-14T14:41:33Z
dc.date.available2016-10-14T14:41:33Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104812
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Technology and Policy Program, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractAnthropogenic climate change is the defining sustainability challenge of the twenty-first century which city-level political leaders are attempting to address by setting carbon neutrality goals for their regions. To reach these goals requires the development of new technologies that only innovation-driven enterprises (IDEs), not small businesses, have the ability to create. IDEs tend to form around one another in clusters known as innovation ecosystems. According to the MIT IDE framework, four elements are necessary for the prosperous growth of an innovation ecosystem: capacity of innovation and entrepreneurship, social structure, economic structure, and underlying institutions. If a region has a desire to create an innovation ecosystem capable of producing IDEs that have a carbon neutral focus, they must adequately develop each of these four elements in a strategic manner. Copenhagen, Denmark and Oslo, Norway are two cities which have made a commitment to become 100% carbon neutral. To achieve their goals, they are growing innovation ecosystems with a focus towards carbon neutrality. Applying the MIT IDE framework to the current progress of these two regions reveals recommendations for future areas of development which will quicken their success. These recommendations include 1) generating significant demand and providing early stage investment for companies with carbon neutral goals, 2) collecting better data about green innovation and economic growth against which the regions can benchmark their progress, and 3) crafting supportive policies which allow current infrastructure to become available for new technology testing.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Bailey E. Richert.en_US
dc.format.extent51 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectInstitute for Data, Systems, and Society.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectTechnology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.titleBuilding innovation ecosystems to drive carbon neutral sustainability goalsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Technology and Policyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society
dc.contributor.departmentTechnology and Policy Program
dc.identifier.oclc958278390en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record