Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, T. Reed
dc.contributor.authorGregory, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorKirchain, Randolph
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T14:20:29Z
dc.date.available2016-10-17T14:20:29Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-17
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104838
dc.description.abstractGuides, standards, product category rules, and environmental product declarations have emerged to evaluate environmental impacts within the buildings sector. These efforts have certainly moved the field forward, but as of yet still do not ensure comparability among building products or whole buildings. In this paper, we aim to address critical issues and make recommendations to practitioners and those developing guidance to enable more robust comparisons of building products and whole buildings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was carried out by CSHub@MIT with sponsorship provided by the Portland Cement Association and the Ready Mixed Concrete Research & Education Foundation. CSHub@MIT is solely responsible for content.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBuildingsen_US
dc.subjectResidential Buildingsen_US
dc.subjectBuilding LCAen_US
dc.subjectLife Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Performanceen_US
dc.subjectBuilding Materialsen_US
dc.subjectConstructionen_US
dc.subjectResidential Constructionen_US
dc.titleCritical Issues When Comparing Whole Building & Building Product Environmental Performanceen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record