Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJames M. Buckley.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Ellen Victoriaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-caen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T19:17:08Z
dc.date.available2016-10-25T19:17:08Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104984
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 89-97).en_US
dc.description.abstractCalifornia's Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program offers gap financing to affordable housing developments and infrastructure projects that demonstrate reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Funded through revenue from the state's carbon cap-and-trade market and motivated by statewide requirements to incentivize compact infill development near transit, AHSC challenges affordable housing developers, transit agencies, and city staff to work collaboratively to address issues of congestion, displacement, and transit access in the context of far-reaching sustainability goals. However, AHSC requirements in its inaugural year (2014-2015) favored projects in California's largest, densest cities, leaving suburban communities skeptical of their ability to tap into the state's largest new pot of funding for affordable housing. One such place is San Mateo County, California, the suburban region on the San Francisco Peninsula that connects San Francisco to San Jose and Silicon Valley. It is within the context of the AHSC program in San Mateo County that I pose the question: to what extent should affluent suburban communities assume a portion of the region's overall housing needs? I consider three scholarly discussions -- suburbanization of poverty, spatial mismatch theory, and exclusionary housing policy -- together to forge an alternative conception of affluent, transit-rich, and diverse inner-ring suburbs and their obligations to steward affordable housing development. To implement this conception on the ground, I consider the opportunities and barriers to affordable housing development in San Mateo County, identify sites that would be competitive for future rounds of AHSC funding, and propose policies and programs to protect critical sites.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ellen Victoria Morris.en_US
dc.format.extent102 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleAffordable housing in a "high-tech Mayberry" : site selection and policy tools for San Mateo County, Californiaen_US
dc.title.alternativeSite selection and policy tools for San Mateo County,en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc959971486en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record