Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRebecca A. Masterson and Richard P. Binzel.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBayley, Laura C. (Laura Christine)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T19:18:17Z
dc.date.available2016-10-25T19:18:17Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105007
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 115-118).en_US
dc.description.abstractNASA Risk Class D programs must meet their technical goals with limited resources. The Regolith X-Ray Imaging Spectrometer (REXIS) is a Class D student collaboration instrument flying on the NASA OSIRIS-REx mission. This thesis describes and analyzes the NASA management and systems engineering processes that were tailored for REXIS. Part of the Class D approach is to accept more risk to meet schedule and cost requirements. This added risk is carried into the Integration and Test (I&T) phase, and can manifest in an off-nominal sequence. The REXIS I&T phase is examined in detail to provide insight into the resource tradeoffs necessary to successfully deliver a Class D instrument. Each step of the I&T sequence is portrayed, including critical incidents that arose during this phase and how they were handled. The I&T process of the REXIS Radiation Cover Deployment System is described in detail, and recommendations are made to further reduce the risk on this critical system. Three key lessons from REXIS I&T are presented to help inform future low-cost, high-risk missions. First, challenges arise when inevitable changes occur between the Engineering and Flight Models. Secondly, procuring flight spare hardware for Class D missions is highly valuable. Finally, small co-located teams ease communication and lessen the burden of documentation, but can have limitations in expertise and flexibility during critical phases.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Laura C. Bayley.en_US
dc.format.extent118 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleIntegration and test of the REgolith X-ray Imaging Spectrometer and recommendations for low-cost, high-risk spaceflight programsen_US
dc.title.alternativeIntegration and test of the REXIS and recommendations for low-cost, high-risk spaceflight programsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc960855730en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record