Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonna H. Rhodes.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSong, Steven Cen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-06T16:14:34Z
dc.date.available2017-01-06T16:14:34Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106267
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, System Design and Management Program, Engineering and Management Program, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis. Vita.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 105-109).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn 2015, the U.S. Army developed a vision to "win in a complex world" called the Army Human Dimension Strategy (AHDS). The AHDS elevates the importance of optimizing individuals and teams as a hedge against the future world challenges (2015). While the AHDS applies to all "warfighting" functions, this thesis investigates the Human Dimension Strategy transformation efforts applied to the U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence (USAICOE) as the enterprise within the larger Human Dimension Enterprise (HDE). The ability of the HDE to provide "optimized human performance" depends on the interaction and alignment of numerous stakeholders across three levels - enterprise, organization, and individual. The HDE is a "system of systems" that requires a systems approach for investigating the transformation of the HDE. The author's intent is to capture key insights for implementing the AHDS. The research methodology includes a literature review, case study, and a systems approach using architecting innovative enterprise strategy (ARIES), systems architecture heuristics, and systems requirements. The research analyzes the interfaces of the enterprise boundaries such as the Individuals, Instructors, Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate (CDID), and Centers of Excellence (COE) [IICCE]. By focusing on these key interfaces, the HDE will be able to streamline the value creation and capture more value. A systems approach provides a more holistic understanding of the AHDS. The human dimension strategy objectives are achievable with the alignment of the enterprise goals, system level requirements, organizational programs, and individual stakeholder needs. The research recommends that the AHDS transformation leverage the synergies with three existing Army programs - Performance Triad (P3), Center for Enhanced Program (CEP), and Tactical Human Optimization, Rapid Rehabilitation, and Reconditioning (THOR3). These three programs address the derived system level requirements for the AHDS's envisioned future.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Steven C. Song.en_US
dc.format.extent114 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.titleInvestigating the U.S. Army's Human Dimension Strategyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Programen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc962185531en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record