Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorElsa Olivetti.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz Ochoa, Maria de Lourdesen_US
dc.contributor.otherTechnology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T19:03:27Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T19:03:27Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107098
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Technology and Policy Program, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 59-63).en_US
dc.description.abstractGrowing concern about climate change and human impact on the environment have resulted in an increase in interest for evaluating the environmental impact of products and services we consume. Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become the most prominent method for environmental evaluation. Life cycle assessment is the quantification of the environmental impacts of a product or service through its whole life cycle, from the extraction of materials to manufacturing and end of life. A carbon footprint is a subset of an LCA. LCAs are required as part of government regulations, used by companies to identify high resource use in their supply chain or to choose between product designs and by consumers to choose between alternative product choices. LCAs provide valuable information; however, they are resource intensive, time consuming and uncertain. Therefore, a methodology that addresses all these issues is needed. This study addresses the following question: Can LCAs be streamlined while still providing useful information? To answer this, an under-specification, probabilistic screening methodology is employed. The screening methodology uses a high level assessment of the footprint, incorporates uncertainty in the inputs, and refines data around the primary drivers of impact. The streamlined LCA procedure is extended to include a Sobol based sensitivity analysis methodology for identifying high impact activities. The effects of partial perfect information in subsequent data acquisition activities on the streamlining methodology are examined. Metrics to determine sufficiency in the data gathering procedure and to determine whether decision makers can sufficiently distinguish between two products or design alternatives are developed. A procedure to quantify the cost of additional information is developed. Finally, an exploration of the scenario space of the impacts is analyzed. The extended streamlined methodology is applied to a case study on tablets, with a focus on integrated circuits. This thesis finds that the streamlined, probabilistic methodology can be used to cost-effectively evaluate the environmental impact of products while still taking uncertainty into account. Metrics to determine sufficiency can be effectively used, and the presence of partial information does not limit the usefulness of the metrics. Furthermore, quantifying the cost of additional information can help determine sufficiency in data collection efforts and can help understand the challenges that companies face when performing an LCA.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Maria de Lourdes Alcaraz Ochoa.en_US
dc.format.extent78 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectInstitute for Data, Systems, and Society.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectTechnology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.titleDevelopment of metrics for streamlined life cycle assessments : a case study on tabletsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Technology and Policyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society
dc.contributor.departmentTechnology and Policy Program
dc.identifier.oclc971254247en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record