Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNeil.E.Todreas and Emilio Baglietto.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOtgonbaatar, Uuganbayaren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-10T14:19:29Z
dc.date.available2017-03-10T14:19:29Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107279
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 327-331).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, a general Methodology framework to characterize, assess and quantify the representativeness uncertainty in performance indicator measurements in thermal and nuclear plants is presented. The representativeness uncertainty arises from the inherent heterogeneity or the variability of the quantity being measured or from the inadequacy of the physical models used to simulate the measurement. The main objective of the Methodology is to gain a deeper physical understanding of the Representativeness uncertainty of the measurement by using numerical simulation tools such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and to quantify various sources of representativeness uncertainty. First, the components of the Methodology are expressed using the normal probability distribution for the uncertainty sources. Second, a non-parametric formulation of the Methodology framework is developed and demonstrated. The use of non-parametric techniques allows the quantification and integration of uncertainties that are not expressed by the normal probability distribution. The Methodology is developed based on the analysis of four industrial Case Studies involving uncertainties in performance indicator measurements to structure the analysis. They are: Mass flow rate measurement by an orifice plate (Case Study 1), Steam Generator recirculation ratio measurement using chemical tracers (Case Study 2), The simulation of cooling tower deformation using a Photomodeler (Case Study 3) and the NOx emission measurement from a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (Case Study 4). In Case Study 1, the non-parametric bootstrap method was used to quantify sampling, iterative and discretization uncertainties thus demonstrating its applicability to CFD uncertainty analysis. In Case Studies 2,3 and 4, the parametric formulation of the Methodology is used to structure the technical analysis.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Uuganbayar Otgonbaatar.en_US
dc.format.extent331 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectNuclear Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.titleMethodology for characterization of representativeness uncertainty in performance indicator measurements of thermal and nuclear power plantsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc972900060en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record