Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoungster, I.
dc.contributor.authorSauk, J.
dc.contributor.authorPindar, C.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, R. G.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, J. L.
dc.contributor.authorRussell, G. H.
dc.contributor.authorHohmann, E. L.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Mark Burnham
dc.contributor.authorAlm, Eric J
dc.contributor.authorGevers, Dirk
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-27T17:27:51Z
dc.date.available2017-04-27T17:27:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.date.submitted2013-12
dc.identifier.issn1058-4838
dc.identifier.issn1537-6591
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108456
dc.description.abstractFecal microbiota transplant is increasingly used to treat recurrent or relapsing Clostridium difficile infection. In this randomized controlled study, using a frozen inoculum from unrelated donors was safe and effective, whether administered by nasogastric tube or by colonoscopy. Background. Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with poor response to standard antimicrobial therapy is a growing medical concern. We aimed to investigate the outcomes of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for relapsing CDI using a frozen suspension from unrelated donors, comparing colonoscopic and nasogastric tube (NGT) administration. Methods. Healthy volunteer donors were screened and a frozen fecal suspension was generated. Patients with relapsing/refractory CDI were randomized to receive an infusion of donor stools by colonoscopy or NGT. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution of diarrhea without relapse after 8 weeks. The secondary endpoint was self-reported health score using standardized questionnaires. Results. A total of 20 patients were enrolled, 10 in each treatment arm. Patients had a median of 4 (range, 2–16) relapses prior to study enrollment, with 5 (range, 3–15) antibiotic treatment failures. Resolution of diarrhea was achieved in 14 patients (70%) after a single FMT (8 of 10 in the colonoscopy group and 6 of 10 in the NGT group). Five patients were retreated, with 4 obtaining cure, resulting in an overall cure rate of 90%. Daily number of bowel movements changed from a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR], 5–10) the day prior to FMT to 2 (IQR, 1–2) after the infusion. Self-ranked health score improved significantly, from a median of 4 (IQR, 2–6) before transplant to 8 (IQR, 5–9) after transplant. No serious or unexpected adverse events occurred. Conclusions. In our initial feasibility study, FMT using a frozen inoculum from unrelated donors is effective in treating relapsing CDI. NGT administration appears to be as effective as colonoscopic administration. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01704937.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) (HHSN272200900018C))en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu135en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Alm via Howard Silveren_US
dc.titleFecal Microbiota Transplant for Relapsing Clostridium difficile Infection Using a Frozen Inoculum From Unrelated Donors: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Pilot Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationYoungster, I.; Sauk, J.; Pindar, C.; Wilson, R. G.; Kaplan, J. L.; Smith, M. B.; Alm, E. J.; Gevers, D.; Russell, G. H. and Hohmann, E. L. “Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Relapsing Clostridium Difficile Infection Using a Frozen Inoculum From Unrelated Donors: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Pilot Study.” Clinical Infectious Diseases 58, no. 11 (April 2014): 1515–1522.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBroad Institute of MIT and Harvarden_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverAlm, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSmith, Mark Burnham
dc.contributor.mitauthorAlm, Eric J
dc.contributor.mitauthorGevers, Dirk
dc.relation.journalClinical Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsYoungster, I.; Sauk, J.; Pindar, C.; Wilson, R. G.; Kaplan, J. L.; Smith, M. B.; Alm, E. J.; Gevers, D.; Russell, G. H.; Hohmann, E. L.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-5987
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-9364
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record