Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid Hsu.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCai, Hongru, M.C.P. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatiala-cc-knen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-15T14:21:47Z
dc.date.available2017-09-15T14:21:47Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111261
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2017.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 66-69).en_US
dc.description.abstractUnprecedented urbanization in China, combined with the increase of extreme weather events globally, has led to greater vulnerability of Chinese cities to urban water management issues including non-point source pollution, shortage of fresh water and urban floodings. In response to these problems, a national policy named "Sponge City" was first introduced in early 2014 to form a comprehensive alternative. Since then, two major views of its conceptualization have defined "Sponge City" as (1) a distributed resilience program modeled after Low Impact Development (LID) and Green Infrastructure (GI), and (2) a growth policy justifying the new investment in urban construction sector and the experimental field of financial innovation to involve private investment such as Public-Private Partnerships (PPP). However, a central contradiction has been widely observed in practice as the environmental and economic agendas of "Sponge City" are not always compatible with each other. This thesis examines the phenomenon where local governments, in the face of such dilemmas, have tended to skew "Sponge City" towards pro-growth policies by branding "Sponge New Districts" in urban outskirts, and asks why and how local governments use "Sponge New District" as a potential resolution. This thesis studies the case of Guangming New District in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province and argues two rationales exist behind this strategy. First, the development of such "Sponge New Districts" provides local government with more opportunities for private investors to profit from basic urban infrastructure projects such as roads and amenities. Second, such development justifies the direct intervention of the government in financing and construction by aligning Sponge New Districts with the local expansion agenda. Nonetheless, these "Sponge New Districts" divert the original environmental ideology of Sponge City and suggest that a fundamental gap exists between an idealized resilience program and the execution of pro-growth agendas at the local governmental level in contemporary China.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Hongru Cai.en_US
dc.format.extent69 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleDecoding Sponge City in Shenzhen : resilience program or growth policy?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc1003291464en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record