Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBrent D. Ryan.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHeneghan, Jessie L. (Jessie Lee)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-nyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-15T15:31:48Z
dc.date.available2017-09-15T15:31:48Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111384
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2017.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 68-70).en_US
dc.description.abstractFinishing the hottest year on record, which happens to be the third hottest year in a row, climate change at this point is indisputable. The need to adapt to a changing climate has become increasingly apparent in low-lying coastal towns and cities as the impacts from climate change including more frequent and powerful storms and rising sea levels intensify. The question of how small, dense, and highly vulnerable coastal communities stay in place, adapt, and build resiliency remains for the most part unanswered. This paper aims to shed light on this topic by employing a mixed method research design incorporating qualitative and observational methods in the analysis of climate adaptation planning on the barrier island of Long Beach, NY five years after Hurricane Sandy left the island devastated. Relying on theories of ecological resiliency that call to mind a 'safe-to-fail' approach rather than engineering resiliency's 'fail-safe' mentality, I look at climate adaptation plans and projects on the barrier island through the conceptual framework of creating systems that anticipate and strategically design for failure through redundancy of functions, connectivity, multifunctionality, adaptive planning, and bio and social diversity. I found that several challenges and obstacles stand in the way of achieving resiliency for the barrier island, including funding gaps, strict permitting processes, entrenched 'home rule', lack of coordination regionally, environmental justice and equity concerns, and the design of resource allocation, among others. Resiliency planning in this context of separate, 'one-off' small adaptation projects within strict municipality boundaries, delayed by permitting and funding issues, can be seen as 'too little, too late'. However, based on my analysis, I make recommendations for a regional approach to resiliency, whereby the various governing bodies of the island together devise a plan for the entire island as one landmass and natural ecology. This new regional entity would be in a position to consider a plan for strategic retreat of those most vulnerable socioeconomically from the places most susceptible to storm surge and sea level rise to safer ground within the same island, as well as to pursue other feasible approaches to creating resiliency for the barrier island of Long Beach.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jessie L. Heneghan.en_US
dc.format.extent84 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleBuilding resiliency or holding off the inevitable? climate adaptation on a dense barrier island in New Yorken_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc1003291695en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record