Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJeehwan Kim.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Samuel (Samuel Steven)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-04T15:07:32Z
dc.date.available2017-10-04T15:07:32Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111766
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2017.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 36-40).en_US
dc.description.abstractVan der Waals epitaxy (vdWE) has gained great interest as it provides the ability to relax the strict lattice matching conditions required in conventional epitaxy of covalent or ionic single crystal substrates. With the rise of two-dimensional (2D) materials since the isolation of graphene in 2004, vdWE has been attempted on 2D materials, transferred, or grown on substrates. However, there has been the notion that the 2D material is the seed layer in van der Waals epitaxy. Notwithstanding, the substrate below the 2D material may play a role in orienting the crystalline growth of overlayers. This is supported by previous studies of a so called "long range" effect, where the potential field of growth substrates influenced the crystal orientation of overlayers through thin amorphous layers, and the "transparency" of graphene, where the contact angle of a droplet was unchanged by the presence of graphene. Here, we report the ability of the underlying substrate below graphene to assign the epitaxial registry of adatoms despite its presence, and thus form epitaxial layers with the same crystal orientation as the substrate during vdWE. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations are utilized to find that the critical separation gap beyond which a substrate and overlayer will lose electronic interaction is -9 A[angstroms], which allows for the insertion of thin graphene at the substrate-epilayer interface. We experimentally test the interaction as a function of distance by transferring monolayer, bilayer and tetra-layer graphene onto GaAs (001) and performing homoepitaxial growth. The results show that single crystalline GaAs with (001) orientation is only obtained on monolayer graphene, revealing that only monolayer graphene may allow the substrate to have influence over the orientation of the overlayer. The method is applied to the homoepitaxial growth of GaP and InP with the same result. The findings further the development of the two-dimensional material based transfer (2DLT) technique, which permits the single crystalline growth of semiconductor materials on top of 2D materials followed by their release and transfer to desired substrates, allowing for novel device designs for applications in advanced and flexible electronics.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Samuel Cruz.en_US
dc.format.extent40 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleMechanism of remote epitaxy using two dimensional materialsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc1004859670en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record