Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, Sudip
dc.contributor.authorTow, Emily W.
dc.contributor.authorPlumlee, Megan H.
dc.contributor.authorBellona, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorLoutatidou, Savvina
dc.contributor.authorKarimi, Leila
dc.contributor.authorMikelonis, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorAchilli, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorGhassemi, Abbas
dc.contributor.authorPadhye, Lokesh P.
dc.contributor.authorSnyder, Shane A.
dc.contributor.authorCurcio, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorVecitis, Chad D.
dc.contributor.authorArafat, Hassan A.
dc.contributor.authorWarsinger, David Elan Martin
dc.contributor.authorLienhard, John H
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-17T19:06:33Z
dc.date.available2018-05-17T19:06:33Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.date.submitted2017-10
dc.identifier.issn0079-6700
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115441
dc.description.abstractConventional water resources in many regions are insufficient to meet the water needs of growing populations, thus reuse is gaining acceptance as a method of water supply augmentation. Recent advancements in membrane technology have allowed for the reclamation of municipal wastewater for the production of drinking water, i.e., potable reuse. Although public perception can be a challenge, potable reuse is often the least energy-intensive method of providing additional drinking water to water stressed regions. A variety of membranes have been developed that can remove water contaminants ranging from particles and pathogens to dissolved organic compounds and salts. Typically, potable reuse treatment plants use polymeric membranes for microfiltration or ultrafiltration in conjunction with reverse osmosis and, in some cases, nanofiltration. Membrane properties, including pore size, wettability, surface charge, roughness, thermal resistance, chemical stability, permeability, thickness and mechanical strength, vary between membranes and applications. Advancements in membrane technology including new membrane materials, coatings, and manufacturing methods, as well as emerging membrane processes such as membrane bioreactors, electrodialysis, and forward osmosis have been developed to improve selectivity, energy consumption, fouling resistance, and/or capital cost. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the role of polymeric membranes and process components in the treatment of wastewater to potable water quality and to highlight recent advancements and needs in separation processes. Beyond membranes themselves, this review covers the background and history of potable reuse, and commonly used potable reuse process chains, pretreatment steps, and advanced oxidation processes. Key trends in membrane technology include novel configurations, materials, and fouling prevention techniques. Challenges still facing membrane-based potable reuse applications, including chemical and biological contaminant removal, membrane fouling, and public perception, are highlighted as areas in need of further research and development. Keywords: Potable reuse; Polymeric membranes; Reverse osmosis; Filtration; Fouling; Reviewen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.004en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Lienharden_US
dc.titleA review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWarsinger, David M. et al. “A Review of Polymeric Membranes and Processes for Potable Water Reuse.” Progress in Polymer Science 81 (June 2018): 209–237 © 2018 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWarsinger, David Elan Martin
dc.contributor.mitauthorLienhard, John H.
dc.relation.journalProgress in Polymer Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-05-10T18:30:51Z
dspace.orderedauthorsWarsinger, David M.; Chakraborty, Sudip; Tow, Emily W.; Plumlee, Megan H.; Bellona, Christopher; Loutatidou, Savvina; Karimi, Leila; Mikelonis, Anne M.; Achilli, Andrea; Ghassemi, Abbas; Padhye, Lokesh P.; Snyder, Shane A.; Curcio, Stefano; Vecitis, Chad D.; Arafat, Hassan A.; Lienhard, John H.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638
dspace.mitauthor.errortrue
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record