Essence Without Fundamentality
Author(s)
Rayo Fierro, Agustin
Downloadewf.pdf (237.7Kb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In Modality and Explanatory Reasoning, Boris Kment argues that a single notion of essence can be used to play two distinct theoretical roles. He thinks there is an important connec- tion between essence and metaphysical necessity, on the one hand, and between essence and metaphysical explanation, on the other.
In this paper I will argue that it is not clear that a single notion of essence should be used to perform both these jobs. For whereas the project of giving metaphysical explanations requires a notion of essence that distinguishes between truths that are more or less “funda- mental” in a metaphysical sense, the project of shedding light on metaphysical necessity does not. Keywords: essence; fundamentality
Date issued
2015-11Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
Publisher
UPV/EHU Press
Citation
Rayo, Agustin. “Essence Without Fundamentality.” THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 30, 3 (November 2015): 349–363
Version: Final published version
ISSN
2171-679X
0495-4548