Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJames M. Lyneis.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarufi, David (David J.)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Integrated Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-15T20:24:50Z
dc.date.available2018-10-15T20:24:50Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118550
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2018.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 68).en_US
dc.description.abstractSystem dynamics modelling is used to explore varying levels of concurrency in a typical design-build-produce project introducing a new product. Faster product life-cycles and demanding schedules have introduced the importance of beginning downstream work (build/manufacturing) while upstream work (design) is incomplete. Conceivably, this project concurrency improves project schedule and cost by forcing rework to be discovered and completed earlier in the project life. Depending on the type of project, some design errors may only be discoverable once the build phase has begun its work. Namely, systemic errors and assembly errors that cannot be easily discovered within the design phase. Pushing build activity earlier in the project allows the rework to be discovered earlier in the project, shortening the overall effort required to complete the project. A mathematical simulation, created using Vensim@ system modeling software, was created by James Lyneis to simulate two-phase rework cycles. The model was tuned to match data based on a disguised real project. Various start dates (as a function of project percentage complete) for downstream phases were explored to find optimal levels of concurrency. Project types were varied by exploring three levels of "rework discoverable within the design phase" to cover a range of project types. The simulation found that for virtually all project types, significant schedule and effort benefits can be gained by introducing the downstream phase as early as 30% to 40% into the project progress and ramping downstream effort over an extended period of time.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby David Garufi.en_US
dc.format.extent93 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectIntegrated Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleError propagation in concurrent product developmenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Programen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Integrated Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc1055163110en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record