Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorThomas W. Eagar.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae Hyun, S.B. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T16:35:03Z
dc.date.available2018-11-15T16:35:03Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119064
dc.descriptionThesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 2018.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 42-44).en_US
dc.description.abstractVolatilities generate uncertainties in the market that critically impact the decisions of producers, consumers, and speculators alike. Historical trends in volatility can be studied as a means of better understanding current volatilities and predicting future ones in the industry. This study used the coefficient of variation (CV) as a relative metric to compare the historical production and price volatilities of various materials - 12 metals, cement, and steel - from 1900 through 2015. The long-term (1900-2015) and short-term (1995-2015) volatilities of these materials were quantified, and decades corresponding to periods of warfare and/or economic recession were shown to exhibit highest volatility. To complement the breadth of this approach, aluminum and steel were used as case studies to determine which factors - amongst production, consumption, energy price, and raw material price - drive trends in U.S. material price volatility. Volatility comparison graphs of material price and the factor in question were generated, and the root mean square (RMS) error between the volatilities was taken as a measure of their correlation. Volatilities in both aluminum and steel price were shown to correlate strongest with volatilities in raw material (bauxite and iron ore) price, with volatilities in steel also correlating comparatively with production and consumption dynamics. Overall, this study demonstrated the effectiveness of CV as a quantitative metric to assess historical volatilities and identified key market forces driving these volatilities for the aluminum and steel industries.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jae Hyun Kim.en_US
dc.format.extent57 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMaterials Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAnalysis of historical trends in material production and price volatilityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc1057728452en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record