Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKaren E. Willcox.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKapteyn, Michael Georgeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T15:42:20Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T15:42:20Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119304
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 81-83).en_US
dc.description.abstractDeciding how to represent and manage uncertainty is a vital part of designing complex systems. Widely used is a probabilistic approach: assigning a probability distribution to each uncertain parameter. However, this presents the designer with the task of assuming these probability distributions or estimating them from data, tasks which are inevitably prone to error. This thesis addresses this challenge by formulating a distributionally robust design optimization problem, and presents computationally efficient algorithms for solving the problem. In distributionally robust optimization (DRO) methods, the designer acknowledges that they are unable to exactly specify a probability distribution for the uncertain parameters, and instead specifies a so-called ambiguity set of possible distributions. This work uses an acoustic horn design problem to explore how the error incurred in estimating a probability distribution from limited data affects the realized performance of designs found using traditional approaches to optimization under uncertainty, such as multi-objective optimization. It is found that placing some importance on a risk reduction objective results in designs that are more robust to these errors, and thus have a better mean performance realized under the true distribution than if the designer were to focus all efforts on optimizing for mean performance alone. In contrast, the DRO approach is able to uncover designs that are not attainable using the multi-objective approach when given the same data. These DRO designs in some cases significantly outperform those designs found using the multi-objective approach.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported in part by AFOSR, Dynamic Data Driven Application Systems Program grant FA9550-16-1-0108 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency EQUiPS program, award W911NF-15-2-0121 New Zealand Marsden Fund grant contract UOA1520 SUTDMIT International Design Centeren_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Michael George Kapteyn.en_US
dc.format.extent83 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleDistributionally robust optimization for design under partially observable uncertaintyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc1061861069en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record