Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeter P. Belobaba.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, William H., S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T15:42:23Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T15:42:23Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119305
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 140-147).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the evolution of U.S. airlines' unit operating costs from 2000-2016 as well as the factors that drove major changes in cost metrics. We assess the trends in operating cost by carrier type as well as for individual airlines and find evidence of a recent operating cost divergence between the legacy carriers and their lower cost counterparts. Since 2014, legacy carriers' unit costs, excluding transport-related and fuel expenses, have risen 6% while low cost carriers and ultra-low cost carriers have seen decreases of 1.6% and 10%, respectively. We see the increase in legacy carriers' unit costs has been driven almost entirely by unit labor costs, which have increased 16% since 2014. While the recent operating cost divergence is attributed in large part to changes in labor costs, we recognize the impacts network characteristics impart of unit operating costs. In order to confirm and quantify the principal drivers of operating cost differences between airlines, we conducted several econometric analyses. We found average stage length per departure, employee productivity (measured as output per employee), average seats per departure, and aircraft utilization to be significant in explaining unit cost differences. For every 1 % increase in each metric operating costs, excluding transport-related and fuel expenses, are estimated to decrease by 0.31%, 0.25%, 0.54%, and 0.50%, respectively. We then perform a more detailed analysis on unit labor costs. We find pilot total compensation has risen for all three carrier types and is almost entirely responsible for the increase in labor costs among the U.S. airlines in our sample. Since 2012, Alaska and Spirit Airlines have been the only airlines that have not seen higher unit total pilot compensation. Our investigation revealed how distortions may be introduced when normalizing pilot compensation by ASMs for purposes of comparing different airlines and conclude by proposing a new normalized metric, seat block hours.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby William H. Lee.en_US
dc.format.extent147 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleU.S. airline industry operating cost measures from 2000-2016en_US
dc.title.alternativeUnited States airline industry operating cost measures from 2000-2016en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc1061861129en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record