Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAbhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZucker, Ariel D. (Ariel Dama)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-05T16:00:18Z
dc.date.available2019-02-05T16:00:18Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120239
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics, 2018.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 209-219).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis studies three questions in development economics. Chapter 1, co-authored with Shilpa Aggarwal and Rebecca Dizon-Ross, explores how the design of incentives should vary with the time preferences of agents. We formulate predictions for two incentive contract variations that should increase efficacy for myopic agents relative to patient ones: increasing the frequency of incentive payments, and making the contract "dynamically non-separable" by only rewarding compliance in a given period if the agent complies in a minimum number of other periods. We test the efficacy of these variations, and their interactions with time preferences, using a randomized evaluation of an incentives program for exercise among 3,200 diabetics in India. On average, providing incentives increases daily walking by 1,300 steps or roughly 13 minutes of brisk walking, and decreases the health risk factors for diabetes. Increasing the frequency of payment does not increase effectiveness, suggesting limited impatience over payments. However, making the payment function dynamically non-separable increases cost-effectiveness. Consistent with our theoretical predictions, agent impatience over walking appears to play a role in non-separability's efficacy: both heterogeneity analysis based on measured impatience and a calibrated model suggest that the non-separable contract works better for the impatient. Chapter 2 presents evidence that the standard electricity billing process contributes to inelastic demand. The paper assesses the elasticity of demand for electricity for customers using two metering and billing technologies. The first technology, postpaid metering, allows customers to use energy and subsequently bills them for the amount utilized. Many features of this system may reduce attentiveness to the marginal price of energy-consuming activities: electricity prices are buried in monthly bills; charges are aggregated over a lengthy billing period, making it difficult to match energy-consuming behaviors to kilowatt-hours used; and bills are delivered after consumption, potentially making cost less salient at the time of consumption. The second technology, prepaid metering, requires customers to purchase electricity prior to its use (similar to a prepaid phone plan). I find that customers who are charged under the second technology are approximately twice as price-elastic as those who are billed later. Chapter 3, co-authored with Nick Hagerty, presents an experimental protocol for a project that pays smallholder farmers in India to reduce their consumption of groundwater. This project will test the effectiveness of payments for voluntary conservation - a policy instrument that may be able to sidestep regulatory constraints common in developing countries. It will also measure the price response of demand for groundwater in irrigated agriculture, a key input to many possible reforms. Evidence from a pilot suggests that the program may have reduced groundwater pumping by a large amount, though confidence intervals are wide.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ariel D. Zucker.en_US
dc.format.extent219 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEconomics.en_US
dc.titleEssays on development economicsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
dc.identifier.oclc1083126930en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record