Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorProst, Victor
dc.contributor.authorOlesnavage, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Amos G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-07T12:08:48Z
dc.date.available2019-03-07T12:08:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-7918-5818-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120768
dc.description.abstractA prosthetic foot prototype intended for evaluating a novel design objective for passive prosthetic feet, the Lower Leg Trajectory Error (LLTE), is presented. This metric enables the optimization of prosthetic feet by modeling the trajectory of the lower leg segment throughout a step for a given prosthetic foot and selecting design variables to minimize the error between this trajectory and target physiological lower leg kinematics. Thus far, previous work on the LLTE has mainly focused on optimizing conceptual foot architectures. To further study this metric, extensive clinical testing on prototypes optimized using this method has to be performed. Initial prototypes replicating the LLTE-optimal designs in previous work were optimized and built, but at 1.3 to 2.1 kg they proved too heavy and bulky to be considered for testing. A new, fully-characterized foot design reducing the weight of the final prototype while enabling ankle stiffness to be varied is presented and optimized for LLTE. The novel merits of this foot are that it can replicate a similar quasi-stiffness and range of motion of a physiological ankle, and be tested with variable ankle stiffnesses to test their effect on LLTE. The foot consists of a rotational ankle joint with interchangeable U-shaped constant stiffness springs ranging from 1.5 Nm/deg to 16 Nm/deg, a rigid structure extending 0.093 m from the ankle-knee axis, and a cantilever beam forefoot with a bending stiffness of 16 Nm2. The prototype was built using machined acetal resin for the rigid structure, custom nylon springs for the ankle, and a nylon beam forefoot. In preliminary testing, this design performed as predicted and its modularity allowed us to rapidly change the springs to vary the ankle stiffness of the foot. Qualitative feedback from preliminary testing showed that this design is ready to be used in larger-scale studies. In future work, extensive clinical studies with testing different ankle stiffnesses will be conducted to validate the optimization method using the LLTE as a design objective.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Tata Center for Technology and Designen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.publisherASME Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-67820en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceASMEen_US
dc.titleDesign and Testing of a Prosthetic Foot Prototype With Interchangeable Custom Rotational Springs to Adjust Ankle Stiffness for Evaluating Lower Leg Trajectory Error, an Optimization Metric for Prosthetic Feeten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationProst, Victor, Kathryn M. Olesnavage, and Amos G. Winter. “Design and Testing of a Prosthetic Foot Prototype With Interchangeable Custom Rotational Springs to Adjust Ankle Stiffness for Evaluating Lower Leg Trajectory Error, an Optimization Metric for Prosthetic Feet.” Volume 5B: 41st Mechanisms and Robotics Conference (August 6, 2017).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT-SUTD Collaborationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorProst, Victor
dc.contributor.mitauthorOlesnavage, Kathryn
dc.contributor.mitauthorWinter, Amos G.
dc.relation.journalVolume 5B: 41st Mechanisms and Robotics Conferenceen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-01-11T14:39:21Z
dspace.orderedauthorsProst, Victor; Olesnavage, Kathryn M.; Winter, Amos G.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-5108
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-2383
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-0889
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record