Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJoshua B. Tenenbaum.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Max Harmon.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T20:32:09Z
dc.date.available2019-07-18T20:32:09Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/121814
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis. "February 2019."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 97-103).en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite rapid recent progress in machine perception and models of biological perception, fundamental questions remain open. In particular, the paradigm underlying these advances, pattern recognition, requires large amounts of training data and struggles to generalize to situations outside the domain of training. In this thesis, I focus on a broad class of perceptual concepts - those that are generated by the composition of multiple causal processes, in this case certain physical interactions - that human use essentially and effortlessly in making sense of the world, but for which any specific instance is extremely rare in our experience. Pattern recognition, or any strongly learning-based approach, might then be an inappropriate way to understand people's perceptual inferences.en_US
dc.description.abstractI propose an alternative approach, compositional simulation, that can in principle account for these inferences, and I show in practice that it provides both qualitative and quantitative explanatory value for several experimental settings. Consider a box and a number of marbles in the box, and imagine trying to guess how many there are based on the sound produced when the box is shaken. I demonstrate that human observers are quite good at this task, even for subtle numerical differences. Compositional simulation hypothesizes that people succeed by leveraging internal causal models: they simulate the physical collisions that would result from shaking the box (in a particular way), and what those collisions would sound like, for different numbers of marbles. They then compare their simulated sounds with the sound they heard.en_US
dc.description.abstractCrucially these simulation models can generalize to a wide range of percepts, even those never before experienced, by exploiting the compositional structure of the causal processes being modeled, in terms of objects and their interactions, and physical dynamics and auditory events. Because the motion of the box is a key ingredient in physical simulation, I hypothesize that people can take cues to motion into account in our task; I give evidence that people do. I also consider the domain of unfamiliar objects covered by cloth. a similar mechanism should enable successful recognition even for unfamiliar covered objects (like airplanes). I show that people can succeed in the recognition task, even when the shape of the object is very different when covered. Finally, I show how compositional simulation provides a way to "glue together" the data received by perception (images and sounds) with the contents of cognition (objects).en_US
dc.description.abstractI apply compositional simulation to two cognitive domains: children's intuitive exploration (obtaining quantitative prediction of exploration time), and causal inference from audiovisual information.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Max Harmon Siegel.en_US
dc.format.extent103 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectBrain and Cognitive Sciences.en_US
dc.titleCompositional simulation in perception and cognitionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1103712575en_US
dc.description.collectionPh.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dspace.imported2019-07-18T20:32:05Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentBrainen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record