Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonald Lessard.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrassin-Drake, Laurel Edwards.en_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T20:35:40Z
dc.date.available2019-07-18T20:35:40Z
dc.date.copyright2018en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/121839
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, February, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 141-158).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I investigate the challenges of 21st century global integration by examining it indepth at a Fortune 200 global supplier (CC) that faces strong pressures of both global integration and local responsiveness. While global integration is typically discussed at a macro level, here I use qualitative methods to study senior managers at a micro level. In this way, I establish critical internal struggles with integration, and reveal external dynamics of integration in a close inter-firm relationship as a strategic supplier. Results highlight the role of Global Management Teams as an essential linking tool. At the same time, I find that conflicting temporalities across locations, accompanied by a globally-shared logic of appropriateness, place restraints on this mechanism of integration: limiting the hours available, and consistently advantaging and disadvantaging specific geographies.en_US
dc.description.abstractI also draw on a unique data set to examine global integration in the context of a close, dependent relationship, with multiple boundary-crossing links. This consists of thirteen months of observations of the weekly virtual meeting of the global account team responsible for CC's largest customer (Alpha). Tracing the collective process by which the team constructs the organizational identity (01) of the "other" from their individual distributed interactions, I find that in constructing Alpha's global 01 the team is also co-creating their own global 01. Further, the process by which the team constructs Alpha's 01 to answer the question "who are they?" parallels well-documented internal processes used by organizational members to answer "who are we?" Importantly, through this co-creation, identity acts both as an alignment mechanism within CC, and across firm boundaries in the relationship.en_US
dc.description.abstractFinally, CC's identity work on Alpha extends beyond construction to shaping and enforcing Alpha's 01 as partner through active voice, engaging the customer's hierarchy from outside to discipline and shape the customer's behavior from within.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Laurel Edwards Grassin-Drake.en_US
dc.format.extent158 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleThe global integration challenge : global management teams, temporal differences, and constructing the identity of the global 'other'en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1108636889en_US
dc.description.collectionPh.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Managementen_US
dspace.imported2019-07-18T20:35:38Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentSloanen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record