Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAlexander H. Slocum.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYue, Brian(Brain J.)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T21:33:46Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T21:33:46Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122424
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 155-156).en_US
dc.description.abstractAbrasive chain saws and cut-off saws used in construction work are not currently kickback regulated even though fatal kickbacks occur with them. Kickback regulation has been in place for wood chain saws since the 1980's, but it is inadequate for regulating abrasive power saws as they have a different cutting mechanic than wood chain saws. This thesis investigates the different kickback modes analytically and experimentally in order to develop tools for characterizing and predicting them. Simple physics models, numerical integrations, and two test rigs were designed to study them. First the different mechanisms which could cause kickback were considered (kickback modes) and simple physics models were made to describe them. From these, it was found that a pinch based kickback was potentially far more dangerous than a tip-engagement or snag type kickback for abrasive saws.en_US
dc.description.abstractUsing the physics based description for a standard kickback, a "Mark I" kickback rig was made as a variant of the 1980s wood saw kickback machine redesigned to produce high energy kickback events. However, testing found that even under extreme conditions kickback energies were not that high. Consequently, a "Mark II" kickback rig was developed to generate pinch based kickback events and to measure the energy produced. A momentum based mathematical model with only one primary tuning parameter was also created to predict parameter sensitivities and to cross-validate the performance of the rig. It was found that the Mark II rig was able to repeatably generate pinch based kickback events and safely measure the energy produced, measuring kickback events which produced more than 70J of kickback energy. Moreover, the model and rig agreed on the effects of changing the angle of the pinch and the pinch force.en_US
dc.description.abstractUltimately the model and rig were meant not only to characterize kickback for academic use, but to proof functional kickback modeling and testing tools which could be further developed to help regulate and design safer abrasive power saws.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Brian J.T.R. Yue.en_US
dc.format.extent214 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of kickback energies in abrasive chain saws and cut-off saws: a theoretical and experimental studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1120126638en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dspace.imported2019-10-04T21:33:45Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentMechEen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record