Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNorvin Richards.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIovtcheva, Snejana P.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T21:33:57Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T21:33:57Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122427
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D. in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 162-174).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is a study of the syntactic and semantic properties of arguments marked with a dative clitic in Bulgarian. Contemporary Bulgarian has been claimed to have lost its Case system compared to its previous historical stages. Yet, as the current study demonstrates, the language has systematically utilized a morphological marker in the form of a dative clitic to identify a particular set of arguments across a wide variety of structural environments - the dative arguments. The major proposal advanced here is that dative arguments are treated uniformly by the grammar of the language because they uniformly represent peripheral arguments introduced in the specifier of a functional head that assigns to them morphological dative Case.en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite the fact that these arguments might assume a wide variety of thematic interpretations (recipients, goals, possessors, sources, beneficiaries, malefactives, etc.), I demonstrate that their meaning is derived structurally from the position in which they are licensed. Crucially, only one dative occurs within a structural domain. The intra-linguistic comparison of a variety of constructions further leads to the conclusion that in each context datives are prominent arguments introduced at the periphery of a structural domain. This proposal explains the ability of datives to bind nominative subjects, to serve as structural subjects in impersonal predicative constructions, and to interact with nominative subjects in bi-clausal environments.en_US
dc.description.abstractTo capture their uniform structural distribution and simultaneously to account for the wide range of thematic meanings, I propose that the argument introducer is a semantically underspecified functional head of the High APPL(icative) type as defined in Pylkkinen (2002/2008). The current study contributes to the ongoing theoretical debate of argument structure and argument interpretation and introduces Bulgarian as a relevant language when it comes to the study of datives in double object constructions, 'quirky' dative subjects, and dative possessors.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Snejana P. Iovtcheva.en_US
dc.format.extent174 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectLinguistics and Philosophy.en_US
dc.titleThe dative arguments in Bulgarianen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D. in Linguisticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1120128067en_US
dc.description.collectionPh.D.inLinguistics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dspace.imported2019-10-04T21:33:56Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentLingen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record