Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonna H. Rhodes and Jeffrey J. Cipolloni.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiddlebrooks, Arthur James.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T21:34:23Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T21:34:23Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122434
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 185-188).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe current and future Operational Environment (OE) for the Unites States (US) military is becoming increasingly complex. This complexity requires Systems Engineers and Architects to develop new approaches for evaluating the variability inherent in the OEs of today and tomorrow. In response to this growing capability gap, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) has established the Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS) program. A core tenant of ERS is Broad Utility-that is, the ability of a system to, "perform effectively in a wide range of operations across multiple futures despite experiencing disruptions". [1, p. 872] The goal of this research is to provide system designers with an approach for architecting systems developed under this program for Broad Utility, as well as systems developed outside of this program, in which stakeholders desire the solution to exhibit similar properties. Specifically, through the utilization of Systems Engineering methods and tools, this research accomplishes four objectives: (1) Develops an integrated, holistic model of the Operational Environment-the Operational Environment Exchange Network (OEEN); (2) Validates Flexibility and Robustness as key Ilities of Broad Utility for technical systems; (3) Proposes a set of Architectural Decisions for achieving Broad Utility; and (4) Provides an example of how to apply the Broad Utility Architectural Decisions to a system design problem for the US Army. The proposed Architectural Decisions link the variables of the Operational Environment exogenous to the technical system to the Ilities of Flexibility and Robustness. By accomplishing these research objectives, the resulting design considerations should enable system designers to increase the likelihood that the resulting system exhibits Broad Utility and is more readily able to remain effective, despite physical, social, or technological changes in its external environment.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Arthur James Middlebrooks.en_US
dc.format.extent188 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleBroad utility : architecting flexible and robust systems for a complex operational environmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeArchitecting flexible and robust systems for a complex operational environmenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Programen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1120721560en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M.inEngineeringandManagement Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Programen_US
dspace.imported2019-10-04T21:34:22Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentSysDesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record