Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaffney, Devin
dc.contributor.authorMatias, J. Nathan
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T18:39:58Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T18:39:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123458
dc.description.abstractAs researchers use computational methods to study complex social behaviors at scale, the validity of this computational social science depends on the integrity of the data. On July 2, 2015, Jason Baumgartner published a dataset advertised to include “every publicly available Reddit comment” which was quickly shared on Bittorrent and the Internet Archive. This data quickly became the basis of many academic papers on topics including machine learning, social behavior, politics, breaking news, and hate speech. We have discovered substantial gaps and limitations in this dataset which may contribute to bias in the findings of that research. In this paper, we document the dataset, substantial missing observations in the dataset, and the risks to research validity from those gaps. In summary, we identify strong risks to research that considers user histories or network analysis, moderate risks to research that compares counts of participation, and lesser risk to machine learning research that avoids making representative claims about behavior and participation on Reddit.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOS Oneen_US
dc.subjectaudit, data, reddit, social media, data analysisen_US
dc.titleCaveat emptor, computational social science: Large-scale missing data in a widely-published Reddit corpusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record