Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJen Cookke.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFinley, Bretton C.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-23T17:00:04Z
dc.date.available2020-01-23T17:00:04Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123612en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Real Estate Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 55-57).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines an emerging product type, single-family build-to-rent, and tests its potential application in tertiary markets of the United States. The build-to-rent ("BTR") model has proven successful in a number of fast-growing secondary markets, such as Phoenix. However, the attributes of these markets differ widely from tertiary markets. This paper examines the key drivers in Phoenix, such as demographics, land costs, construction costs, cap rates and rents that have made this product successful and compares these metrics against those of tertiary markets in an effort to evaluate whether single-family BTR is a viable product type in those markets. Case studies are used to compare secondary markets to tertiary markets. Oklahoma City, Tucson and Fresno are selected as the tertiary markets based on their varying affordability scores as measured by the Housing Opportunity Index. This index was chosen to test whether homeownership affordability predicts BTR success. While there are different varieties of BTR products, these case studies examine a hypothetical 20-acre project of 160 single-family detached homes of approximately 1,800 square feet each. Untrended Returns on Cost ("ROC") were found to be similar to Phoenix in Oklahoma City and Tucson. However, due to the slower rent growth and higher cap rates of these tertiary markets, Internal Rates of Return and Equity Multiples were found to be too low to justify this specific BTR design. However, further institutionalization of this asset class and a reevaluation of the pricing of SFR volatility has the potential to lower cap rates to a level that justifies the BTR product in tertiary markets.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Bretton C. Finley.en_US
dc.format.extent57 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCenter for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.titleThe viability of the "build-to-rent" single-family model in tertiary marketsen_US
dc.title.alternativeViability of the BTR single-family model in tertiary marketsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Real Estate Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate
dc.identifier.oclc1135874259en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M.inRealEstateDevelopment Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in conjunction with the Center for Real Estateen_US
dspace.imported2020-03-09T19:59:36Zen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record