Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSiqi Zheng.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Kun,M.C.P.Massachusetts Institute of Technology.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatiala-cc---en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-28T20:52:20Z
dc.date.available2020-02-28T20:52:20Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123949
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 75-77).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs a prominent place-based policy (PBP) in China, special economic zones (SEZ) contribute a substantial portion of GDP using very little land. Similar practices such as enterprise zones, industrial parks, and business districts widely exist in other parts of the world, but studies of such PBP's effects in the United States and Europe show both positive and negative outcomes. Recent studies on China's SEZs and industrial parks show a positive agglomeration and spillover effect, which indicate effective coordination through the visible hand--policy intervention. However, empirical studies also show problems of over-investment and spatial misallocation. To complement existing empirical evidence of the outcome of SEZs, I propose a conceptual framework to help understand the development model of China's SEZs utilizing an analysis of two specific case studies, Bazhong New Economic Zone in Sichuan Province, and Gu'an High-tech Special Economic Zone in Hebei Province. In this framework, I propose three modules to examine an SEZ, including the formation of the central coordinator, the industry selection mechanism and outcome, and a conceptual cash flow model. This thesis finds that the SEZs which are collaborated with private developers are more likely to be successful than the Government-led SEZs. It discusses the reasons for and implications of this tendency.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kun Cheng.en_US
dc.format.extent95 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleUnderstanding special economic zone policy in China : a conceptual framework and two casesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1140386896en_US
dc.description.collectionM.C.P. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dspace.imported2020-02-28T20:52:19Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentUrbStuden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record