Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOlivier L. de Weck.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCollin, Anne(Anne Claire)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-23T18:09:33Z
dc.date.available2020-03-23T18:09:33Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124170
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 189-207).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe inclusion of autonomous vehicles into our transportation networks requires methods for evaluation and certification of systems on the vehicle. Adding sensors or computing capabilities to the vehicle might improve performance for specific tasks, or resilience, but can also be accompanied with an increase in cost, system latency, and energy consumption. Currently, no method exists to quantify the trade-offs between these metrics of interest at the system level. This thesis provides a framework to support hardware selection by presenting a method to evaluate the effect of sensor type and placement on the vehicle's ability to perform Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), and select high performing and resilient sensor architectures for realistic driving situations from the benchmarked KITTI dataset. For the specific sequence considered, this thesis shows that designing for resilience increases cost by only 4%. It is also found that LiDARs are critical to the performance and resilience of sensing systems in many different environments. A systems model for processor and bus selection is then developed, in order to minimize cost and latency of the hardware architecture, taking into account recent safety measures recommended by the ISO 26262. This model enables the evaluation of the impact of sensor choice on the overall latency. A new method is proposed to enumerate efficiently sensor architectures and place them in the tradespace containing four dimensions of interest: cost, latency, energy consumption and SLAM performance. It is found that, due to diminishing returns, the best architecture is 360% more expensive than the second best, for a performance increase of 1%. Finally, the framework is applied to specific situations such as the test of a new sensor, or poor weather conditions, providing architecture insights for the intelligent transportation community.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Anne Collin.en_US
dc.format.extent207 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleA systems architecture framework towards hardware selection for autonomous navigationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1143738749en_US
dc.description.collectionPh.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dspace.imported2020-03-23T18:09:32Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentAeroen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record