Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSteven R. H. Barrett.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Z. Juju(Zhishen Juju)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-23T18:10:15Z
dc.date.available2020-03-23T18:10:15Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124181
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 49-52).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper quantifies the impacts of various policy options on the economic viability of six aviation biofuel production technologies. The pathways considered are isobutanol to jet from corn grain, hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) from inedible fats and oils (IFO), HEFA from palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD), synthesized iso-paraffins (SIP) from sugarcane, Fischer-Tropsch (FT) gasification and synthesis from municipal solid waste (MSW), and micro FT from wood residues. The policies considered include feedstock subsidies, capital grants, output based incentives, and a number of policies intended to reduce project risk. Stochastic techno-economic analysis (TEA) models for each pathway are used to quantify the impact of the policies on the median and probabilistic distribution of project net present value (NPV), and minimum selling price (MSP) of the resulting middle distillate fuel products. The policies of interest were layered on top of each baseline TEA model and the relationships between total policy costs and pathway NPVs were determined. The findings of this work show that on average, in the absence of any policies, none of the technology pathways studied are financially viable. In addition, the magnitude of various policy options to achieve economic viability, or 'breakeven', are calculated: the required policy ranges from a total cost of 35 to 337 million USD, equivalent to an output subsidy of approximately 0.07 to 0.71 USD/liter. At the same time, our analysis demonstrates that the cumulative impact of multiple policies on the magnitude of real-world examples could result in economically viable aviation biofuel production.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Z. Juju Wang.en_US
dc.format.extent52 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleQuantitative policy analysis for aviation biofuel production technologiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1144177523en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dspace.imported2020-03-23T18:10:13Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentAeroen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record