Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBande, Lindita
dc.contributor.authorAfshari, Afshin
dc.contributor.authorAl Masri, Dina
dc.contributor.authorJha, Mukesh
dc.contributor.authorNorford, Leslie Keith
dc.contributor.authorTsoupos, Alexandros
dc.contributor.authorMarpu, Prashanth
dc.contributor.authorPasha, Yosha
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T19:08:45Z
dc.date.available2020-04-28T19:08:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.date.submitted2019-07
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124908
dc.description.abstractThe city of Abu Dhabi is growing every year in population, urban extent and energy demand. This research focuses on the application of two simulation programs to estimate changes in urban climate associated with continued development in Abu Dhabi: The Urban Weather Generator (UWG) and ENVI-met. Simulation with these two software packages are validated with the site data measured in downtown Abu Dhabi. A comparison analysis (in the different seasons) between the rural data, the simulation output, and the site measurements shows the variations of the UHI in this Middle Eastern city and the potential of the validated tools. The main aims of this study are: (a) to make a seasonal validation of the UWG for the city of Abu Dhabi (referring to urban-rural available data). The tool was previously validated for a year (no seasonal division) for Abu Dhabi, Toulouse, Basel, Singapore, Rome and Barcelona. The simulations are based on the 2016 version of the Urban Weather Generator. The analysis is separated into three main seasons (instead of the full year): winter, spring, summer. (b) To make a seasonal validation and improve the second tool evaluated in this study, ENVI-met 4.0. The software can simulate urban temperature, humidity and wind speed. Guides are proposed for the enhancement of the accuracy of both estimation procedures. Referring to the results, UWG tends to overestimate the canyon temperature during the summer and has a more realistic estimation on the winter season. ENVI-met has better estimations of temperatures during the summer season compared to UWG. Finally, the UWG weather file contributes a more detailed energy model on a mesoscale model. It considers the seasonal effect and shows the impact of the climate on profiling the UHI phenomena. ENVI-met needs improvement in calculating the anthropogenic heat and in calculation of the mean radiant temperature.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11164378en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMDPIen_US
dc.titleValidation of UWG and ENVI-met models in an Abu Dhabi District, based on site measurementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBande, Lindita, et al. “Validation of UWG and ENVI-Met Models in an Abu Dhabi District, Based on Site Measurements.” Sustainability 11, 16 (August 2019): 4378. © 2019 The Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architectureen_US
dc.relation.journalSustainabilityen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-18T11:35:08Z
dspace.date.submission2019-10-18T11:35:15Z
mit.journal.volume11en_US
mit.journal.issue16en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record