Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMariana Arcaya.en_US
dc.contributor.authorField, Julia(Julia Marie)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T22:05:06Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T22:05:06Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127588
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, May, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from the official PDF of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 78-85).en_US
dc.description.abstractTrees provide many environmental, social, and economic benefits. Urban neighborhoods do not have equal access to trees, however. Recent scholarship shows that historically redlined neighborhoods, as demarcated by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) maps, have lower tree canopy coverage compared to other HOLC-graded neighborhoods. This thesis investigates five cities that experienced the largest percent increase in tree canopy coverage in redlined neighborhoods between 2001-2011. These cities are Lynchburg, VA; Haverhill, MA; Birmingham, AL; Charlotte, NC, and Durham, NC. I also update the geospatial analysis to include the most recent 2016 tree canopy data to measure change. I hypothesized that the tree canopy increase was the result of a concerted effort to focus on redlined neighborhoods and that the canopy would continue to increase between 2011 to 2016.en_US
dc.description.abstractThrough semi-structured interviews with key government and nonprofit actors, the case studies explore the role of governance in tree planting programs and the implementation of tree ordinances. The results indicate that the canopy increase in these five cities was largely unplanned and not a part of a formal policy agenda. Between 2011-2016, the tree canopy declined by less than one percent in most redlined neighborhoods. Overall, tree canopy increase in redlined areas was due to several factors: individual actors that prioritized planting trees in redlined neighborhoods, city-wide landscaping or tree preservation ordinances, and planting programs done in collaboration with tree nonprofits. Common challenges to increasing canopy coverage stemmed from limitations of the built environment, residents declining tree plantings, a lack of tree advocacy groups, a lack of engagement with neighborhood groups, and issues with municipal funding.en_US
dc.description.abstractThese positive case studies demonstrate ways cities can prioritize planting trees in an equitable way and suggest mechanisms to incentivize preserving existing trees. Keywords: urban tree canopy governance, redlining, environmental justice, political ecology, tree planting programs, tree preservation ordinancesen_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Julia Field.en_US
dc.format.extent85 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleUrban tree canopy governance and redlined neighborhoods: an analysis of five citiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1193555819en_US
dc.description.collectionM.C.P. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dspace.imported2020-09-15T22:05:05Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentUrbStuden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record