Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJung-Hoon Chun.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLegg, Cole C.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T21:30:55Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T21:30:55Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127930
dc.descriptionThesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, May, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from the official PDF of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 14).en_US
dc.description.abstractOften companies must make the decision whether or not to manufacture a part on their own or to outsource the manufacturing of that part to a supplier. The results of these "make-or-buy" decisions have impacts on that company's manufacturing competencies and strategies moving forward [1]. They also compound over time to define that company's production depth. A company's production depth is defined as the ratio of value-adding content that a company creates itself [2]. While the impact of "make-or-buy" decisions have clear implications on a company's long-term strategies, the relationship between a company's production depth and its profitability has not yet been studied as there is not a defined way to measure production depth from a company's publicly available financial data. This study examines two different methods of estimating production depth using publicly available financial data.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe first method uses the ratio of raw and in-progress materials versus finished goods in a company's inventories to represent the company's production depth. The second method for estimating production depth is the ratio of the difference between the company's manufacturing cost and total trade purchases to its total cost of manufacturing. This study used the first method to evaluate different automotive companies' production depth in 2018. This study also examines BMW's production depth using both methods. The first method of measuring production depth is advantageous because all public automotive companies published the data on their inventories necessary to make the calculation. The second method is advantageous because it takes into account costs with manufacturing outside of just material costs.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhile there were no statistically significant relationships found between this study's production depth estimates and profitability, applying these two methods two automotive companies allowed us to gain insight into estimating production depth using publicly available financial data.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Cole C. Legg.en_US
dc.format.extent14 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleUsing publicly available financial data to measure production depth in the automobile industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1197979354en_US
dc.description.collectionS.B. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dspace.imported2020-10-08T21:30:54Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeBacheloren_US
mit.thesis.departmentMechEen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record