Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRoger Levy.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhan, Meilin,Ph. D.Massachusetts Institute of Technology.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T19:34:03Z
dc.date.available2021-01-06T19:34:03Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129231
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, May, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 117-125).en_US
dc.description.abstractSpeakers often face choices as to how to structure their intended message into an utterance. When multiple options are available to express more or less the same meaning, what general principles govern speaker choice? Here I investigate the influence of contextual predictability on the encoding of linguistic content manifested by speaker choice in a classifier language, Mandarin Chinese. In English, a numeral modifies a noun directly (e.g., three tables). In classifier languages such as Mandarin Chinese, it is obligatory to use a classifier (CL) with the numeral and the noun (e.g., three CL.flat table, three CL.general table). While different nouns are compatible with different specific classifiers, there is a general classifier "ge" (CL.general) that can be used with most nouns. I focus on the alternating options between using the general classifier versus a specific classifier with the same noun where the options are nearly semantically invariant.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhen the upcoming noun has high surprisal, the use of a specific classifier would reduce surprisal at the noun thus potentially facilitate comprehension (predicted by the Uniform Information Density account (Levy & Jaeger, 2007)), but the use of that specific classifier may be dispreferred from a production standpoint if accessing the general classifier requires less effort (predicted by the Availability-Based Production account (Bock, 1987; Ferreira & Dell, 2000)). Using evidence from naturalistic language datasets and real-time language production experiments, I have argued that speaker choice is emerged from availability-based production and is the results of speaker-centric information processing, where availability is affected by linguistic experience such as contextual predictability and word frequency, as well as real-time production pressure in speaking.en_US
dc.description.abstractFrom the perspective of language design, the redundancy in information content shared between nouns and classifiers provides a mechanism that potentially is beneficial for the listener, making communication more robust. However, the capacity of using a specific classifier is constrained by speaker-oriented availability production.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Meilin Zhan.en_US
dc.format.extent125 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectBrain and Cognitive Sciences.en_US
dc.titleInvestigating theories of speaker choice in a classifier languageen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1227512608en_US
dc.description.collectionPh.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dspace.imported2021-01-06T19:34:02Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentBrainen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record