Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeilbrun, Brian J. (Brian James)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T16:48:42Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T16:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132824
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, September, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from the official version of thesis. "September 2020."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 88).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the Oil & Gas industry Production Engineers are responsible for monitoring well performance and ensuring that each well produces at its target rate. Wells can experience a wide variety of problems that negatively impact production. It is the Production Engineer's responsibility to identify and fix these problems as early as possible. Well tests that measure how much oil, gas, and water a well is producing are taken for each well once a month. Production Engineers are able to identify when a well has a problem by observing trends in well test data. When a well's production declines faster than expected, the Engineer will conduct a study of all the activity in the area in hopes of identifying what events caused the change in behavior. The sheer volume of wells for which an Engineer is responsible, coupled with the amount of time it takes to investigate each problem, poses a major challenge. We have developed a program capable of monitoring well performance that can identify and describe changes in well performance. When a change is detected, the program investigates data from nearby wells and provides a summary of the events it deems most likely to be responsible for causing the change. The program can make suggestions based on these findings and provide daily reports that allow Engineers to focus on executing the solution rather than investigating the problem. By creating a framework that allows the program to make sense of event-behavior pairs, we have created an assistant that supports Production Engineers in their most critical role. Furthermore, we have tested the systems that will allow this program to act as a true assistant to the Engineer, and not simply function as another tool that must be learned. In addition to performance monitoring and root cause identification already described, these systems include speech-based interaction, data querying, and results visualization.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Brian J. Heilbrun.en_US
dc.format.extent88 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleAI assistant for the oil & gas production engineeren_US
dc.title.alternativeArtificial intelligence assistant for the oil and gas production engineeren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Programen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1262991228en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M.inEngineeringandManagement Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Programen_US
dspace.imported2021-10-08T16:48:41Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentSysDesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record