Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManyala, Sucharitha.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T17:10:43Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T17:10:43Z
dc.date.copyright2021en_US
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132892
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, February, 2021en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from the official version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe technology sector is driven by rapid innovations, the pace and magnitude of technological changes and complexities, and a reliance on specialized skills and expertise. Not all firms are able to organically develop all the technologies and capabilities they need to stay competitive. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) give buyers looking to achieve strategic goals an alternative to organic growth. Technology companies have often pursued M&A as a means to acquire new technology, as an alternative to organic technology development. Strategic motives such as broadening scope, achieving cost synergies, getting access to skills or technologies faster, and several others drive companies to engage in M&A. These motives are widely reported in the literature and are deemed to be critical in improving an organization's financial performance and increasing shareholder value. This thesis summarizes a subset of these motives or deal rationales that are most prominent in the technology sector, analyzes a sample of past technology deals between 2008 and 2018, and categorizes them based on the strategic intent behind the deal-making. This study examines the long-term value these motives generate in each category by measuring and comparing financial metrics pre- and post-merger. Various financial metrics like quick-ratio, CAGR (compound annual growth rate) and total shareholder return (TSR) are analyzed in the process and ultimately TSR has been chosen to measure the long-term value of the deals in this study. This study concludes "Cross-Selling" and "Acquiring technical capabilities" as having probability of higher returns and higher success rate among those studied.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Sucharitha Manyala.en_US
dc.format.extent102 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleDeal rationales for technology M&A : an analysis of the two year value generateden_US
dc.title.alternativeDeal rationales for technology mergers and acquisitionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Programen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1263357763en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M.inEngineeringandManagement Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Programen_US
dspace.imported2021-10-08T17:10:43Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentSysDesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record